Investing Investing Essentials.
27 Essays and Thoughts on Degrowth
Table of Contents Expand. Shareholders' Rights Plans. Voting Rights Plans. Staggered Board of Directors. Greenmail Option. White Knight, Strategic Partner. Increasing Debt. Making an Acquisition. Acquiring the Acquirer.
- Recommended for you;
- Peace, Security and Defence Cooperation in Post-Brexit Europe?
- National Defence Act?
- Life From The Top Of The Mind?
- Passion-Driven Classroom, The: A Framework for Teaching and Learning?
- Latest Posts;
Triggered Option Vesting. The Bottom Line.
Update the TOC with changes
Compare Investment Accounts. The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. Related Articles. Corporate Insurance Why is a shareholder rights plan called a "poison pill? Friendly Takeover. Partner Links. Related Terms People Poison Pill A people pill is a defensive strategy to ward off a hostile corporate takeover.
The Truth Behind Poison Pills? A poison pill is a form of defense tactic utilized by a target company to prevent or discourage attempts of a hostile takeover by an acquirer. As the name "poison pill" indicates, this tactic is analogous to something that is difficult to swallow or accept.
Lock-Up Option A lock-up option is a stock option offered by a target company to a white knight for additional equity or the purchase of a portion of the company. Hostile Takeover A hostile takeover is the acquisition of one company by another without approval from the target company's management. How Greenmail Works Greenmail is the practice of buying enough shares to threaten a hostile takeover so that the target company will repurchase its shares at a premium.
These include publicly available policy briefs, analyses and comments. Most of the articles discussed here have dealt with these broader issues. According to Gotkowska, the differences in the strategic culture of EU Member States could even widen, in particular between key players within the Union, including France, Germany and Poland.
Only this talk of a potential US departure, which would require an intensified European defence policy on the part of Western EU Member States, could possibly trigger an actual withdrawal of the US from Europe. He emphasises the political importance of PESCO but, at the same time, criticises tendencies of exclusion of the states of Central and Eastern Europe with weaker defence industries.
Zaborowski also sees the Polish defence sector as increasingly in need of structural reform, since it is predominantly state-owned and grappling with major efficiency and cost issues. The dominant threat perceptions in Poland are thoroughly incompatible with those of France.
Corporate Takeover Defense: A Shareholder's Perspective
The European geostrategic dilemma could be resolved if the divergent interests were to be evened out and the different priorities mutually recognised, i. She argues that Germany and France are pursuing different priorities in all areas, despite having a similar assessment of the situation.
France would not shy away from unilateral action, if no option for action at the European level was available. The German method is less targeted and strategically unambitious, as Kunz asserts. However, this approach is usually met with incomprehension and irritation from the French side. She writes that it is up to France to strengthen its strong security and defence links with the UK in the future European security architecture after Brexit. On a strategic level, there may be greater convergence with London than with most other European partners.
This also applies generally to those observations concerned with the general challenges and potential structural changes of EU defence policy.
This could open up new opportunities to integrate the UK into a future European security and defence architecture, an aspect most writers include in their observations in the run-up to Brexit slated for 29 March In other words, Berlin should increasingly take on the role of mediator itself. For example, you may want to link a mention of a section to that actual section in your document. Consider the following text:. Before we can link, we need to tell Word that these are headings.
We do this by using styles and formatting. Highlight both headings, then go to your HOME tab in the ribbon and choose a heading style. There are a couple places this could be, depending on how Word is configured. The following two screenshots show some places you might find the styles menu. Now your headings are styled as headings. You can always change how they look in terms of color, size, etc.
The important thing is that Word now knows they are headings.
Now, again, highlight the text to hyperlink and bring up the Hyperlinks box. Highlight the one to which you want to link and then click OK:. Now, you may be thinking that this is a good way to create a TOC as well.
- About the author!
- Things I Need to Tell My Children (& Yours too...)?
- Bibliographic Information!
- Table of Contents?
- Latest Posts.
- Corporate Takeover Defense: A Shareholder's Perspective.
- My Time With God: Devotions from a psychological perspective.
Word has a built-in TOC tool that automates the creation of TOCs and also, importantly, allows you to update them with just the click of a mouse. For example, you could call chapter titles Heading 1, first-level headings Heading 2, second-level headings Heading 3, and so on. Consider the following document, which I have set up with one chapter heading Heading 1 , three level-one headings Heading 2 , and two level-three headings Heading 3.
Combat Damage Formula | Harry Potter Wizards Unite Wiki - GamePress
As a side note: Word has built in a number of different formatting schemes from which you can choose. First, place your cursor where you want the TOC to appear. The cool thing about this TOC is that you can update it with the click of a mouse.